(a) Let , and be the angles corresponding to points A, B and C respectively. From the statement of the problem, those angles are i.i.d. .
The angles ,
and
divide
the
range in four successive sub-intervals. The argument is wrong because the problem
is not symmetric with respect to the three arcs, but rather with respect to
the four angle sub-intervals. The average length of each sub-interval is
, by
symmetry. The length of the arc that contains the point (1,0) is the sum of the
first and fourth sub-intervals, so it is twice as long as the other arcs on average.
(b)
CDF,
PDF,
(c)
We can reach the same result from the qualitative explanation given in part (a): since is the sum of the first and fourth sub-intervals, where the length of each sub-interval is on average, .